Former RFK Jr. Adviser Alleges Corporate Influence Under White House Chief of Staff
Calley Means, a former top adviser to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., criticized outgoing White House chief of staff Susie Wiles in a recent interview. Means alleged that Wiles's tenure prioritized corporate interests in health policy decisions.

Sioux Falls, SD, November 6, 2026 —
Washington D.C. – Calley Means, who previously served as a top adviser to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has publicly criticized Susie Wiles, the outgoing White House chief of staff. The allegations were made during a recent interview, though the specific date and platform of this interview were not provided in the available information.
Means’s criticism centers on Wiles’s tenure as chief of staff. According to Means, Wiles’s leadership in that role allegedly prioritized the interests of corporations over broader health policy considerations. The summary provided did not specify which corporate interests were allegedly favored or detail the particular health policy decisions that were influenced.
The role of a White House chief of staff is to oversee the Executive Office of the President, manage the White House staff, and control access to the president. Health policy is a significant area that can be influenced by various stakeholders, including corporate entities, patient advocacy groups, and public health organizations.
Means’s position as a former adviser to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. places him in a unique vantage point to observe and comment on health policy discussions within the administration. However, the full scope of his allegations and the evidence supporting them were not detailed in the provided summary.
The summary did not include any specific examples of health policies or decisions that Means believes were compromised. Furthermore, no statements from Susie Wiles or other White House officials responding to these allegations were included in the summary. The precise nature of the corporate interests allegedly prioritized and the specific health policies affected remain unspecified in the information available.
Story summarized from the original created by Nathaniel Weixel on thehill.com, see more information here.
Media gallery


